On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 10:08:24AM -0700, Michael Eager wrote: > David Edelsohn wrote: > >On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> > >wrote: > > > >>Two options, -mcmodel= and -mfpu=, had cases that fell through to the > >>next case without comments to indicate if this was intended. I added > >>comments to make the semantics explicit. Given the documentation, it > >>may well be intentional for -mcmodel= but is more doubtful for -mfpu=. > > > >I doubt that either of the fall through cases was intended. > > > >Alan, is mcmodel suppose to set m64? > > > >Michael, is mfpu suppose to set mrecip? > > No. There was a break statement at the end of case OPT_mfpu which > disappeared when OPT_mrecip was added.
Yes, it was an error on my part. Sorry. I will fix the GCC 4.6 branch. I will hold off fixing the on trunk, on the assumption this patch will go in. I can fix it if desired. -- Michael Meissner, IBM 5 Technology Place Drive, M/S 2757, Westford, MA 01886-3141, USA meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com fax +1 (978) 399-6899