Re: [C++ Patch] PRs 48737 & 48744

[Jason Merrill]

On 05/08/2011 12:51 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
@@ -5203,7 +5203,7 @@ reshape_init_r (tree type, reshape_iter *d, bool f
            {
              ++d->cur;
              gcc_assert (BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (init));
-             return reshape_init (type, init);
+             return reshape_init (type, init, tf_warning_or_error);

Any reason not to SFINAEify reshape_init_r as well?  Same question for 
process_init_constructor*.

Jason