On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Toon Moene <t...@moene.org> wrote: > On 05/18/2011 10:31 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> Not that I'm too excited to see GCC built with a C++ compiler (or even C++ >> features being used). > > Hmmm, you think using "false" as a value for a pointer-returning function is > just A-OK ?
No, it isn't ;) Richard. > Duh, I'm glad I'm using Fortran, where the programmer isn't even supposed to > know what the value of .FALSE. is, because it is implementation dependent. > > -- > Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 > Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Â Maartensdijk, The Netherlands > At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/ > Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news >
