On 11-05-20 10:17 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Ryan Mansfield<rmansfi...@qnx.com> wrote:
There is a crash in vect_is_slp_reduction where use_stmt doesn't get
initialized in the FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST loop.
1718 FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST (use_p, imm_iter, lhs)
(gdb) call debug_tree(lhs)
<ssa_name 0x7ffff6e3a5a0
type<integer_type 0x7ffff7f8c7e0 int32_t sizes-gimplified public SI
size<integer_cst 0x7ffff7ec47e0 constant 32>
unit size<integer_cst 0x7ffff7ec4580 constant 4>
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff7ecb498
precision 32 min<integer_cst 0x7ffff7ec4780 -2147483648> max<integer_cst
0x7ffff7ec47a0 2147483647> context<translation_unit_decl 0x7ffff7f98508
D.1314>
pointer_to_this<pointer_type 0x7ffff7f9f930>>
var<var_decl 0x7ffff6e1ce60 g_29_lsm.18>def_stmt g_29_lsm.18_137 = PHI
<g_29_lsm.18_87(15), D.2113_96(18)>
version 137>
(gdb) n
1742 if (found)
(gdb)
1746 if (gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
(gdb)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000980f22 in gimple_code (g=0x0) at ../../gcc/gimple.h:1098
1098 return g->gsbase.code;
Is the following sufficient?
No, we shouldn't arrive with a NULL use_stmt here.
OK, thanks. I've filed PR49087 with a testcase.
Regards,
Ryan Mansfield
