Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> writes:
>> We could certainly duplicate (some of) the logic that %P already uses,
>> but I though it easier to just introduce a straightforward variant (%p)
>> instead. It's not pretty, but it worked.
>
> OK then... can you propose a new patch, please, changing as little of
> generic code as possible?
I'll try, but somewhat fear that I will arive again at what I had
initially. Will probably have to wait for the weekend.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
