On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:16:26PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 22:08 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:03:53PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > > 2011-06-08 Steve Ellcey <s...@cup.hp.com>
> > >
> > > PR middle-end/49191
> > > * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_strict_align): New.
> > > * gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c: Add dg-require-effective-target strict_align.
> >
> > Isn't the test backwards, i.e. doesn't
> > { dg-require-effective-target strict_align }
> > actually mean !STRICT_ALIGNMENT?
>
> You are right. What do you think I should do, reverse the test or just
> rename it? I would be inclined to just rename it, maybe:
>
> dg-require-effective-target non_strict_align
Yeah, either that, or reverse the test and then
{ dg-do run { target { !strict_align } } } */
(if that is the right syntax).
Jakub
