On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 21:12, Gabriel Charette <gch...@google.com> wrote:
> It appears names_size is not even used anywhere in the code > (or at least I couldn't find any use of it with `grep "names_size" -R gcc/`. > Should we just remove it? Yes, we should remove it. Jason, the field cp_binding_level.names_size is essentially write-only: $ grep -r '\<names_size\>' . ./ChangeLog-2002: names_size and vtables. ./ChangeLog-2002: (wrapup_globals_for_namespace): Use names_size instead ./cp/ChangeLog-2002: names_size and vtables. ./cp/ChangeLog-2002: (wrapup_globals_for_namespace): Use names_size instead ./cp/name-lookup.h: size_t names_size; ./cp/name-lookup.c: b->names_size++; I suppose it's OK to remove it, right? Diego.
