On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Bruce Korb wrote: > >> Hi Richard, >> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: >> > >> > It happens that OpenBSD suffers from a bogus fixinclude that changes >> > its perfectly valid NULL define from (void *)0 to 0. The fix itself >> > appears to be very old and is completely bogus - it replaces >> > (void *)0 with 0 under the assumption the former is invalid for C++ - >> > which is true - but 0 is inappropriate for C which is much worse. >> > >> > Thus, I propose to remove the fix altogether. Platform maintainers >> > can arrange for a new fix if the platforms still need fixing (which >> > I seriously doubt after so many years and platform obsoletion). >> > >> > This restores bootstrap on OpenBSD. >> > >> > Ok for trunk and active branches? >> >> Sounds completely reasonable to me, but I think the platform maintainers >> do need to say, "okay". Cheers - Bruce > > We do not have an Interix maintainer listed, that leaves David for AIX. > David, is this ok? If not, can you please work on a better more > specific fixinclude wrapping the C++ variant inside __GNUG__?
Okay with me. Thanks, David
