[...] On Jul 7, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Michael Meissner > <meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> I certainly can call the switch -mno-static-chain, which is perhaps more >> meaningful (at least to us compiler folk, I'm not sure static chain means >> much >> to the normal programmer). > > Well, that's up to the target maintainers to decide, maybe > -mno-nested-functions instead? Isn't that an issue of pointer to nested functions rather than nested functions ? So -mno-nested-function-pointers would be more accurate That's somewhat important from an Ada POV as nested subprograms are common, but access/pointer to nested subprogram is not very usual. My two cents. Tristan.
