On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:46:24AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Apparently I failed to update this text when doing the gnu89 -> gnu11
> change.
>
> Ok?
>
> 2015-01-29 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
>
> * doc/standards.texi: Reflect that the default for C is gnu11.
>
> diff --git gcc/doc/standards.texi gcc/doc/standards.texi
> index fef81ae..97b12c8 100644
> --- gcc/doc/standards.texi
> +++ gcc/doc/standards.texi
> @@ -110,12 +110,10 @@ they conflict with the C standard version selected.
> You may also
> select an extended version of the C language explicitly with
> @option{-std=gnu90} (for C90 with GNU extensions), @option{-std=gnu99}
> (for C99 with GNU extensions) or @option{-std=gnu11} (for C11 with GNU
> -extensions). The default, if no C language dialect
> -options are given, is @option{-std=gnu90}; this is intended to change
> -to @option{-std=gnu11} in some future release. Some features that are
> -part of the C99 standard are
> -accepted as extensions in C90 mode, and some features that are part of
> -the C11 standard are accepted as extensions in C90 and C99 modes.
> +extensions). The default, if no C language dialect options are given,
> +is @option{-std=gnu11}. Some features that are part of the C99 standard
Let's pretend I put two spaces before "Some".
> +are accepted as extensions in C90 mode, and some features that are part
> +of the C11 standard are accepted as extensions in C90 and C99 modes.
>
> The ISO C standard defines (in clause 4) two classes of conforming
> implementation. A @dfn{conforming hosted implementation} supports the
Marek
