On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 02/05/2015 11:01 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> Can you elaborate why it depends on COPY relocation? There >>> is no COPY relocation on x86-64. >> >> Ho hum, we appear to have switched topics mid-thread. >> >> I agree that we cannot override a weak symbol in the executable with even a >> non-weak symbol in a shared library. > > Hi HJ, > > Is your patch supposed to fix weak symbols too? Will > SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P evaluate to true for weak defined symbols with this > patch? I tested this in gcc-4_9 and it didnt seem to do that.
A patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00410.html -- H.J.
