On 02/09/2015 11:51 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: > We reject the following testcase in C99 mode, because in C99 we always > wrap COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR in a SAVE_EXPR when initializing a range of > elements, even though the expression is required to be constant. As a > consequence, we error out with "initializer element is not constant". > It's been like this since Roger's fold changes in 2003. Since the default > is now gnu11, I think we should accept the code even in C99. So this patch > makes the C FE treat the expression the same in both C90/C99 modes. There > is no need to add any pedwarns at this spot.
Ah, I see, the pedwarn already exists elsewhere. That threw me for a bit. The patch is ok. r~
