Steve Ellcey <steve.ell...@imgtec.com> writes: > On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 15:54 -0800, Matthew Fortune wrote: > > Thanks for looking through and catching this. > > > > I had conflicting thoughts on whether the new condition should > > reference both !ISA_HAS_FP_CONDMOVE || ISA_HAS_SEL but if we take it > > that FP_CONDMOVE is the only way to get an integer conditional move > > based on an FP condition then that's fine. > > > > > 2015-03-02 Steve Ellcey <sell...@imgtec.com> > > > > > > PR target/58158 > > > * config/mips/mips.md (mov<mode>cc): Change ISA_HAS_SEL check to > > > !ISA_HAS_FP_CONDMOVE. > > > > OK. > > > > Are you planning on doing any backports of this patch to release > > branches? > > > > Thanks, > > Matthew > > Given that it is very small and safe I think backporting it would make > sense. I will check it in on the main line today and if there are no > problems after a few days I could check it in on the 4.8 and 4.9 > branches if that sounds good to you.
Sounds good. Thanks, Matthew
