On 10/03/15 12:10 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
Errrmmmm. If GCC 5 implements (present tense) this new feature, why is the description written mostly in the future tense? :-(
When compiling such a function, GCC will do as described. I'm happy to change it though, how's the attached revision? (I also changed "as if y were an rvalue" to "as though y were an rvalue" because the repetition of "if" that follows seems clunky now I read it again.)
