On 07 Apr 22:37, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> 
> OK, thanks!
> Please put the comment about inline clones just before the global.inlined_to 
> test
> and make the comment about thunks separate.
> Probably "Thunks can not call across section boundary"
> 
> Honza

Here is a committed variant.

Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/

2015-04-08  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkov...@intel.com>

        * ipa-comdats.c (propagate_comdat_group): Walk through thunks.

gcc/testsuite/

2015-04-08  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkov...@intel.com>

        * gcc.target/i386/mpx/chkp-thunk-comdat-3.c: New.


diff --git a/gcc/ipa-comdats.c b/gcc/ipa-comdats.c
index f349f9f..4298b9b 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-comdats.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-comdats.c
@@ -142,12 +142,14 @@ propagate_comdat_group (struct symtab_node *symbol,
       {
        struct symtab_node *symbol2 = edge->caller;
 
-       /* If we see inline clone, its comdat group actually
-          corresponds to the comdat group of the function it is inlined
-          to.  */
-
        if (cgraph_node * cn = dyn_cast <cgraph_node *> (symbol2))
          {
+           /* Thunks can not call across section boundary.  */
+           if (cn->thunk.thunk_p)
+             newgroup = propagate_comdat_group (symbol2, newgroup, map);
+           /* If we see inline clone, its comdat group actually
+              corresponds to the comdat group of the function it
+              is inlined to.  */
            if (cn->global.inlined_to)
              symbol2 = cn->global.inlined_to;
          }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/chkp-thunk-comdat-3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/chkp-thunk-comdat-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd0057e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/mpx/chkp-thunk-comdat-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx -O -fvisibility=hidden" } */
+
+int val;
+
+static int __attribute__((noinline))
+test1 ()
+{
+  return val;
+}
+
+static int __attribute__((bnd_legacy,noinline))
+test2 ()
+{
+  return test1 ();
+}
+
+int
+test3 (void)
+{
+  return test2 ();
+}
+

Reply via email to