On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:47 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes, this is an example from PR I am referring to. Did you try to >>> define LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS? It is supposed to fix this. >>> >> >> They make things even more complex. ix86_simplify_base_index_disp >> is called after reload is done since we can do this translation safely >> only on hard registers, not on pseudo registers. >> > > Hi Uros, > > The current implementation has been tested extensively. I'd like to keep > it ASIS so that we can have a working x32 support. We will revisit it later: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49765 > > after we have a working x32 GCC. This can not be only my decision, I have CCd other x86 maintainers and RMs for their opinion on this question. Uros.
