On 1 May 2015 at 01:12, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi again, > > On 04/30/2015 08:45 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> >> .. also, your patch doesn't seem to fix the case of -w instead of That could be fixed as follows: if (!warn_narrowing || inhibit_warnings) ok = true; else // pedwarn >> -Wno-narrowing. I think we want to check the return value of the pedwarn >> instead. I'm testing something. > > I'm finishing testing the below: with hindsight, checking the return value > of the pedwarn makes a lot of sense to me! Indeed, checking return value of pedwarn is better compared to testing on warning flags. Thanks for pointing out -;)
Regards, Prathamesh > > Paolo. > > ///////////////////////
