Hi

Following Marc Glisse comment #4 on:https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65641 I would like to propose this enhancement to the hash functor for pointers. It simply gets rid of the irrelevant bits on pointers hash code based on memory alignment of the pointed type. The only drawback I can think of is that the type needs to be complete at std::hash instantiation time but is it really an issue ?

IMO it is quite obvious that the resulting hash code will be better but if anyone has a good method to prove it I can try to implement it. The test I have added in quality.cc is very basic and just reflect enhancement following Marc's comment.

2015-05-05  François Dumont <fdum...@gcc.gnu.org>

    * include/bits/functional_hash.h
    (std::__detail::_Lowest_power_of_two<size_t>): New.
    (std::hash<_Tp*>::operator()): Use latter.
    * testsuite/20_util/hash/quality.cc (pointer_quality_test): New.

Tested under Linux x86_64.

François

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/functional_hash.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/functional_hash.h
index d94843f..a217f8a 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/functional_hash.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/functional_hash.h
@@ -36,6 +36,29 @@
 
 namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
 {
+namespace __detail
+{
+_GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
+
+  // Compute highest power of 2 lower or equal to __n.
+  template<size_t __n>
+    struct _Lowest_power_of_two
+    {
+      static const size_t __val
+        = _Lowest_power_of_two< (__n >> 1) >::__val + 1;
+    };
+
+  template<>
+    struct _Lowest_power_of_two<1>
+    { static const size_t __val = 0; };
+
+  template<>
+    struct _Lowest_power_of_two<0>
+    { static const size_t __val = 0; };
+
+_GLIBCXX_END_NAMESPACE_VERSION
+}
+
 _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
 
   /** @defgroup hashes Hashes
@@ -63,7 +86,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
     {
       size_t
       operator()(_Tp* __p) const noexcept
-      { return reinterpret_cast<size_t>(__p); }
+      {
+	return reinterpret_cast<size_t>(__p)
+	  >> __detail::_Lowest_power_of_two<alignof(_Tp)>::__val;
+      }
     };
 
   // Explicit specializations for integer types.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/hash/quality.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/hash/quality.cc
index af417ed..d9c72c7 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/hash/quality.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/hash/quality.cc
@@ -164,9 +164,20 @@ quality_test()
     }
 }
 
+void
+pointer_quality_test()
+{
+  bool test __attribute__((unused)) = true;
+
+  double d1, d2;
+  std::hash<double*> dh;
+  VERIFY( dh(&d1) % sizeof(double) != dh(&d2) % sizeof(double) );
+}
+
 int
 main()
 {
   quality_test();
+  pointer_quality_test();
   return 0;
 }


Reply via email to