Hi! This patch fixes a thinko in get_min_precision. If we want UNSIGNED number and arg_min is signed, but non-negative, calling wi::min_precision with SIGNED resulted in one bigger precision than necessary. If get_min_precision is originally called with SIGNED and sign is then changed into UNSIGNED, this will be accounted for in the + (orig_sign != sign) later on.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2015-05-12 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR target/66112 * internal-fn.c (get_min_precision): Use UNSIGNED instead of SIGNED to get precision of non-negative value. * gcc.target/i386/pr66112-1.c: New test. --- gcc/internal-fn.c.jj 2015-04-17 13:50:55.000000000 +0200 +++ gcc/internal-fn.c 2015-05-12 10:33:13.380205685 +0200 @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ get_min_precision (tree arg, signop sign } else if (sign == UNSIGNED && !wi::neg_p (arg_min, SIGNED)) { - int p = wi::min_precision (arg_max, SIGNED); + int p = wi::min_precision (arg_max, UNSIGNED); prec = MIN (prec, p); } return prec + (orig_sign != sign); --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66112-1.c.jj 2015-05-12 10:36:11.253284919 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr66112-1.c 2015-05-12 10:36:57.239529802 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* PR target/66112 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ + +unsigned int +foo (long long a, long long b) +{ + unsigned int res; + a &= ~0U; + b &= ~0U; + if (__builtin_mul_overflow (a, b, &res)) + res = 0x123U; + return res; +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "jn?o\[ \t\]" } } */ Jakub