On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 08:36 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Peter Bergner <berg...@vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 16:40 -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: > >> Ah, never mind. I guess I need to run automake first. > > > > I ran the patch on powerpc64-linux (ie, Big Endian) both with and > > without --enable-default-pie. Both bootstraps completed with no > > errors and the without --enable-default-pie regtested without any > > regressions. > > > > The --enable-default-pie regtesting shows massive failures that I > > have to look into. I'm haven't determined yet whether these are > > all -m32 FAILs or -m64 FAILS or both. I'll report back with more > > info after I dig into some of the failures. > > Does --enable-default-pie work on powerpc64-linux? Do you > get working PIE by default? Some GCC tests expect non-PIE. > I fixed some of them:
I haven't looked into any of the failures yet. That said, powerpc64-linux is PIC by default, so I thought maybe PIE would just work. Maybe it does and it's just powerpc-linux tests that are failing (I run the testsuite with both -m32 and -m64). I won't know until I get some time to have a deeper look. That said, if there is something you know of that I should look for or at, I'd appreciate it. Peter
