On 06/05/2015 01:04 AM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Mon, 2015-05-11 15:23:33 +0200, Andreas Krebbel 
> <kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> gcc/
>>      * config/s390/constraints.md (j00, jm1, jxx, jyy, v): New
>>      constraints.
>>      * config/s390/predicates.md (const0_operand, constm1_operand)
>>      (constable_operand): Accept vector operands.
>>      * config/s390/s390-modes.def: Add supported vector modes.
>>      * config/s390/s390-protos.h (s390_cannot_change_mode_class)
> [...]
> 
> Starting with this patch, it seems my buildrobot won't be able to
> build a s390{,x}-linux compiler:
> 
> g++   -g -O2 -DIN_GCC  -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE  -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti 
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings 
> -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic 
> -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -fno-PIE -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc   
> -o build/genattrtab \
>     build/genattrtab.o build/rtl.o build/read-rtl.o build/ggc-none.o 
> build/vec.o build/min-insn-modes.o build/gensupport.o build/print-rtl.o 
> build/hash-table.o build/read-md.o build/errors.o 
> ../build-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libiberty/libiberty.a
> build/genattrtab /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/common.md 
> /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/config/s390/s390.md insn-conditions.md \
> -Atmp-attrtab.c -Dtmp-dfatab.c -Ltmp-latencytab.c
> genattrtab: invalid alternative specified for pattern number 1015
> Makefile:2167: recipe for target 's-attrtab' failed
> make[1]: *** [s-attrtab] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jbglaw/build/s390x-linux/build-gcc/gcc'
> Makefile:4119: recipe for target 'all-gcc' failed
> make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
> 
> The above error is taken from this build:
> 
>       http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=444690

This has been reported by Jakub already. He also proposed a fix in his email:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00012.html

Bye,

-Andreas-

Reply via email to