On 8 June 2015 at 18:53, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 June 2015 at 18:37, Martin Sebor <mse...@redhat.com> wrote: >> In the hunk below, should the sizes_match template parameter >> be privatized (since it isn't part of the public interface)? >> Or perhaps even removed if it's not used? > > Yes, it should be uglified, thanks.
Ahem, yes, actually removed since it's there only to be specialized.
