On 06/24/2015 06:52 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
> 
> In the gcc-5-branch, I can see that your new inhibit-warn-2.C test
> fails (targets ARM and AArch64).
> 
> I can see this error message in g++.log:
> /aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/gccsrc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C:
> In function 'void fn1()':
> /aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/gccsrc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C:29:3:
> error: 'typename A<(F<typename C< <template-parameter-1-1>
>> ::type>::value || B:: value)>::type D::operator=(Expr) [with Expr =
> int; typename A<(F<typename C< <template-parameter-1-1>
>> ::type>::value || B:: value)>::type = int]' is private
> /aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/gccsrc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C:35:7:
> error: within this context
> 
> Christophe.
> 
Oops. Sorry for that, it seems that I messed up with my testing box and
the backport did not actually get regtested :(.

The problem is caused by difference in wording of diagnostics. GCC 6
gives an error on line 35 and a note on line 29:

$ ./cc1plus ~/gcc/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C
 void fn1()
/home/miyuki/gcc/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C:35:7:
error: 'typename A<(F<typename C< <template-parameter-1-1>
>::type>::value || B:: value)>::type D::operator=(Expr) [with Expr =
int; typename A<(F<typename C< <template-parameter-1-1> >::type>::value
|| B:: value)>::type = int]' is private within this context
   opt = 0;
/home/miyuki/gcc/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C:29:3:
note: declared private here
   operator=(Expr);

GCC 5 gives two errors:

/home/miyuki/gcc/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C:29:3:
error: 'typename A<(F<typename C< <template-parameter-1-1>
>::type>::value || B:: value)>::type D::operator=(Expr) [with Expr =
int; typename A<(F<typename C< <template-parameter-1-1> >::type>::value
|| B:: value)>::type = int]' is private
   operator=(Expr);
/home/miyuki/gcc/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C:35:7:
error: within this context
   opt = 0;

It can probably be fixed like this:

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C
index cb16b4c..f658c1d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/inhibit-warn-2.C
@@ -26,11 +26,11 @@ class D
 {
   template <class Expr>
   typename A<F<typename C<Expr>::type>::value || B::value>::type
-  operator=(Expr); // { dg-message "declared" }
+  operator=(Expr); // { dg-message "private" }
 };

 void fn1()
 {
   D opt;
-  opt = 0; // { dg-error "private" }
+  opt = 0; // { dg-error "this context" }
 }

But I am not sure, what should I do in this case. Maybe it is better to
remove the failing testcase from GCC 5 branch (provided that
inhibit-warn-1.C tests a fix for the same bug and does not fail)?

-- 
Regards,
    Mikhail Maltsev

Reply via email to