On 23/06/15 11:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com> wrote:
On 22/06/15 13:47, Richard Biener wrote:
(eventually also for the case where we
end up only computing the fast-query stuff).
Like this?
...
diff --git a/gcc/dominance.c b/gcc/dominance.c
index 9c66ca2..58fc6fd 100644
--- a/gcc/dominance.c
+++ b/gcc/dominance.c
@@ -679,6 +679,12 @@ calculate_dominance_info (enum cdi_direction dir)
free_dom_info (&di);
dom_computed[dir_index] = DOM_NO_FAST_QUERY;
}
+ else
+ {
+#if ENABLE_CHECKING
+ verify_dominators (CDI_DOMINATORS);
+#endif
+ }
compute_dom_fast_query (dir);
Yeah.
I realized we actually want to verify 'dir' rather than
'CDI_DOMINATORS'. The patch also fixes this for the early-out verification.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
Committed to trunk.
Thanks,
- Tom
Verify reused dominators info in calculate_dominance_info
2015-06-24 Tom de Vries <t...@codesourcery.com>
* dominance.c (calculate_dominance_info): Fix verify_dominators call
argument. Call verify_dominator when reusing dominator info.
---
gcc/dominance.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/dominance.c b/gcc/dominance.c
index 9c66ca2..fb61596 100644
--- a/gcc/dominance.c
+++ b/gcc/dominance.c
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ calculate_dominance_info (enum cdi_direction dir)
if (dom_computed[dir_index] == DOM_OK)
{
#if ENABLE_CHECKING
- verify_dominators (CDI_DOMINATORS);
+ verify_dominators (dir);
#endif
return;
}
@@ -679,6 +679,12 @@ calculate_dominance_info (enum cdi_direction dir)
free_dom_info (&di);
dom_computed[dir_index] = DOM_NO_FAST_QUERY;
}
+ else
+ {
+#if ENABLE_CHECKING
+ verify_dominators (dir);
+#endif
+ }
compute_dom_fast_query (dir);
--
1.9.1