On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 05:00:14PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Just like the patch for AARCH64_FUSION_PAIR, this is a patch for
> AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION.  Note I tested this patch on top of the
> patch for AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> Remove the hack for AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_ALL.
> 
>     Remove index from AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION
> 
>     Instead of doing an explict index in aarch64-tuning-flags.def, we
>     should have an enum which does the index instead.  This allows
>     you to add/remove them without worrying about the order being
>     correct and having holes or worry about merge conficts.
> 
>     OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.

-ENOPATCH, but assuming this is along the same lines as the one I just
acked, I'm happy for you to consider this preapproved (after checking
the comments below). Please send a copy to the list for the archives.

>     ChangeLog:
>     * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def: Remove all index to
> AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION.
>     * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (extra_tuning_flags_index): New enum.

I'm guessing that this has a more aarch64-centric name like
aarch64_extra_tuning_flags_index ? If not, it probably should have just to
fit with the naming scheme in the rest of the file.

>     (aarch64_extra_tuning_flags): Base the shifted value on the index instead
>     of the argument to AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION.
>     * config/aarch64/aarch64.c: Remove the last argument to
> AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION..

Watch out for the extra . on the end of this ChangeLog line..

Thanks,
James

> 

Reply via email to