Richard Biener writes: > I see the following ICE: > > t.c:13:1: internal compiler error: in decompose_normal_address, at > rtlanal.c:6090 > } > ^ > 0xc94a37 decompose_normal_address > /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/rtlanal.c:6090 > 0xc94d25 decompose_address(address_info*, rtx_def**, machine_mode, > unsigned char, rtx_code) > /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/rtlanal.c:6167 > 0xc94dc3 decompose_mem_address(address_info*, rtx_def*) > /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/rtlanal.c:6187 > 0xb61149 process_address_1 > /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:2867 > 0xb61c4e process_address > /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:3124 > 0xb62607 curr_insn_transform > /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:3419 > 0xb65250 lra_constraints(bool) > /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4421 > > that looks like a latent issue to me in an area of GCC I am not > familiar with. I suggest to open a bugreport and CC Vladimir.
Thanks for the info. Done https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67305 > > The r226850 change caused us to eliminate an induction variable > early (I suspect IVOPTs would have done this later anyway, but > I did not verify that): > > Replaced redundant PHI node defining bl_2 with c_1 > Replaced c_1 + 1 with bl_15 in all uses of c_16 = c_1 + 1; > Removing dead stmt c_16 = c_1 + 1; > Removing dead stmt bl_2 = PHI <0(2), bl_15(3)> > > Thanks, > Richard. > >> Thanks. >> -- Regards, Jiong
