On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:18 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Christophe Lyon
> <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 3 September 2015 at 13:31, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Christophe Lyon
>>> <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On 1 September 2015 at 16:04, Christophe Lyon
>>>> <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 25 August 2015 at 17:31, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Christophe Lyon
>>>>>> <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Some subsets of the tests override ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or
>>>>>>> TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS and perform effective_target support tests using
>>>>>>> these modified flags.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch adds a new function 'clear_effective_target_cache', which
>>>>>>> is called at the end of every .exp file which overrides
>>>>>>> ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, a simple English directive somewhere that says, if one changes
>>>>>> ALWAYS_CXXFLAGS or TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS then they should do a
>>>>>> clear_effective_target_cache at the end as the target cache can make
>>>>>> decisions based upon the flags, and those decisions need to be redone
>>>>>> when the flags change would be nice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do wonder, do we need to reexamine when setting the flags? I’m
>>>>>> thinking of a sequence like: non-thumb default, is_thumb, set flags
>>>>>> (thumb), is_thumb. Anyway, safe to punt this until someone discovers it
>>>>>> or is reasonable sure it happens.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, all looks good. Ok.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Here is what I have committed (r227372).
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm, in fact this was r227401.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It caused:
>>>
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(arm_neon_ok,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(arm_neon_ok,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(arm_neon_ok,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(dfp,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(fsanitize_address,value)": no such element in
>>> array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ia32,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ia32,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ia32,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ia32,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ia32,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ilp32,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ilp32,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ilp32,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ilp32,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(label_values,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(lp64,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(lp64,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(lp64,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ptr32plus,value)": no such element in array
>>> ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ptr32plus,value)": no such element in array
>>> ...
>>>
>>> on Linux/x86-64:
>>>
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-09/msg00167.html
>>>
>>
>> I'll have a look.
>> That's the configuration I used to check before committing, but I am
>> going to re-check.
>
> proc check_cached_effective_target { prop args } {
> global et_cache
> global et_prop_list
>
> set target [current_target_name]
> if {![info exists et_cache($prop,target)]
> || $et_cache($prop,target) != $target} {
> verbose "check_cached_effective_target $prop: checking $target" 2
> set et_cache($prop,target) $target
> set et_cache($prop,value) [uplevel eval $args]
> lappend et_prop_list $prop
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Aren't you appending $pop to et_prop_list even if it may be already
> on the list?
>
> verbose "check_cached_effective_target cached list is now:
> $et_prop_list" 2
> }
> set value $et_cache($prop,value)
> verbose "check_cached_effective_target $prop: returning $value for
> $target" 2
> return $value
> }
>
Like this?
--
H.J.
---
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index aad45f9..a6c16fe 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -125,7 +125,9 @@ proc check_cached_effective_target { prop args } {
verbose "check_cached_effective_target $prop: checking $target" 2
set et_cache($prop,target) $target
set et_cache($prop,value) [uplevel eval $args]
- lappend et_prop_list $prop
+ if {[lsearch $et_prop_list $prop] < 0} {
+ lappend et_prop_list $prop
+ }
verbose "check_cached_effective_target cached list is now: $et_prop_list" 2
}
set value $et_cache($prop,value)
