Hi, On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
> The issue we have with LTO is that the linemap gets populated in quite > random order and thus we repeatedly switch files (we've mitigated this > somewhat for GCC 5). Yes. > We also considered dropping column info (and would drop range info) as > diagnostics are from optimizers only with LTO and we keep locations > merely for debug info. That would be the obvious mitigations, yes. I do like the fact that we'd be able to do all this without enlarging location_t. Ciao, Micha.
