On 05/09/2015 23:02, François Dumont wrote: > On 22/08/2015 14:24, Daniel Krügler wrote: >> 2015-08-21 23:11 GMT+02:00 François Dumont <frs.dum...@gmail.com>: >>> I think I found a better way to handle this problem. It is c++locale.cc >>> that needs to be built with --fimplicit-templates. I even think that the >>> *_cow.cc file do not need this option but as I don't know what is the >>> drawback of this option I kept it. I also explicitely used the file name >>> c++locale.cc even if it is an alias to a configurable source file. I >>> guess there must be some variable to use no ? >>> >>> With this patch there are 6 additional symbols. I guess I need to >>> declare those in the scripts even if it is for internal library usage, >>> right ? >> I would expect that the new Catalog_info definition either has deleted >> or properly (user-)defined copy constructor and copy assignment >> operator. >> >> >> - Daniel >> > This type is used in C++98 so I need to make those private, not deleted. > > With this change, is the patch ok to commit ? > > François >
What about this patch ? I am still uncomfortable in exposing those implementation details in the versionned symbols but I don't know how to do otherwise. Do you want me to push this code in std::__detail namespace ? François
