On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:

> Here, we were crashing on an assert in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info:
> 
> 506   gcc_assert (!SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P (name));
> 
> The problem is that reset_flow_sensitive_info wasn't clearing the
> SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P flag; I don't think NULL SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO
> can ever describe an anti-range...

Yeah, also not a range.  Thus I think the assert is bogus (aka
superfluous) if !SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (name) holds.

Otherwise other setters of SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO would need to make
sure SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P is cleared as well.

> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk/5?

So - can you instead remove the assert?

Thanks,
Richard.

> 2015-10-05  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR tree-optimization/67821
>       * tree-ssanames.c (reset_flow_sensitive_info): Also clear
>       the SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P flag.
> 
>       * gcc.dg/torture/pr67821-2.c: New test.
>       * gcc.dg/torture/pr67821.c: New test.
> 
> diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67821-2.c 
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67821-2.c
> index e69de29..38cfc84 100644
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67821-2.c
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67821-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +
> +int a, b, c, d, e, g;
> +short f;
> +
> +void
> +fn1 ()
> +{
> +  int i;
> +  f = a - b;
> +  e = (c && (i = d = (unsigned) f - 1)) || i;
> +  g = (unsigned) f - 1;
> +  c && (d = 0);
> +}
> diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67821.c 
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67821.c
> index e69de29..1c9e8b9 100644
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67821.c
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr67821.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +
> +int isdigit (int);
> +
> +int
> +foo (const char *s)
> +{
> +  int success = 1;
> +  const char *p = s + 2;
> +  if (!isdigit (*p))
> +    success = 0;
> +  while (isdigit (*p))
> +    ++p;
> +  return success;
> +}
> diff --git gcc/tree-ssanames.c gcc/tree-ssanames.c
> index 64e2379..c3484fe 100644
> --- gcc/tree-ssanames.c
> +++ gcc/tree-ssanames.c
> @@ -561,7 +561,10 @@ reset_flow_sensitive_info (tree name)
>       mark_ptr_info_alignment_unknown (SSA_NAME_PTR_INFO (name));
>      }
>    else
> -    SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (name) = NULL;
> +    {
> +      SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO (name) = NULL;
> +      SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P (name) = 0;
> +    }
>  }
>  
>  /* Clear all flow sensitive data from all statements and PHI definitions
> 
>       Marek
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to