Here is my promised backport to the GCC 4.9 branch, for the patch below that went into ToT last week. As with the previous patch, I've verified that it fixes the problem, bootstraps and has no new regression test failures. Is this ok to commit to the gcc-4_9-branch?
-- Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com gcc/ChangeLog: 2015-10-26 Caroline Tice <cmt...@google.com> (from Richard Biener) * tree.c (int_cst_hash_hash): Replace XORs with more efficient calls to iterative_hash_host_wide_int.
gcc-fsf-4_9.patch
Description: Binary data