On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:20:26PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015, Jeff Law wrote: > > > Based on Bernd's comments, I think this is fine. Any sense of how much work > > there is left to cleanup the runtime's inclusion of gcc's config/ target > > headers? > > See <https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Top-Level_Libgcc_Migration>. I think most > of that page other than the list of target macros describes stuff that was > done some time ago (which should be verified, and then the obsolete pieces > removed), and the list of host-side target macros used in target-side code > may not be fully up to date, but it should be indicative of what needs > fixing. (The division by possible approaches for fixing each macro is > extremely rough, however - probably several macros would best be fixed in > some way other than the initial guess I put on that page. And if moving > macros to libgcc_tm.h, note my warning at (b)(ii) in > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-02/msg00218.html> about some libgcc files > not including libgcc_tm.h.)
yeah, there's a fair bit of work left, I'm kind of hopeful it might be done some time next year, but that assumes I can make myself keep working on it, refactoring code that is hard to test isn't that much fun :) Trev > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > jos...@codesourcery.com
