Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/gensupport.c b/gcc/gensupport.c
> index 0480e17..484ead2 100644
> --- a/gcc/gensupport.c
> +++ b/gcc/gensupport.c
> @@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ htab_eq_string (const void *s1, const void *s2)
> and a permanent heap copy of STR is created. */
>
> static void
> -add_mnemonic_string (htab_t mnemonic_htab, const char *str, int len)
> +add_mnemonic_string (htab_t mnemonic_htab, const char *str, size_t len)
> {
> char *new_str;
> void **slot;
> @@ -2306,7 +2306,7 @@ gen_mnemonic_setattr (htab_t mnemonic_htab, rtx insn)
> for (i = 0; *cp; )
> {
> const char *ep, *sp;
> - int size = 0;
> + size_t size = 0;
>
> while (ISSPACE (*cp))
> cp++;
> @@ -2333,8 +2333,7 @@ gen_mnemonic_setattr (htab_t mnemonic_htab, rtx insn)
> {
> /* Don't set a value if there are more than one
> instruction in the string. */
> - obstack_next_free (&string_obstack) =
> - obstack_next_free (&string_obstack) - size;
> + obstack_blank_fast (&string_obstack, -size);
> size = 0;
>
> cp = sp;
Maybe ssize_t instead of size_t since we're using the negative? Or does
that still trigger a warning?
OK either way for gensupport.c, thanks.
Richard
