Hi,
On 11/10/2015 05:36 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
+
+ /* Did array size calculations overflow or does the array
+ cover more than half of the address-space? */
+ if (COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type)
+ && TREE_CODE (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (type)) == INTEGER_CST
+ && !valid_constant_size_p (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (type)))
+ {
+ if (name)
+ error_at (loc, "size of array %qE is too large", name);
+ else
+ error_at (loc, "size of unnamed array is too large");
+ type = error_mark_node;
+ }
}
Obviously "the issue" predates your proposed change, but I don't
understand why the code implementing the check can't be shared by the
front-ends via a small function in c-family...
Paolo.
