On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Wilco Dijkstra <wilco.dijks...@arm.com> wrote:
>> Evandro Menezes wrote:
>> Hi, Wilco.
>>
>> It looks good to me, but FCMP is quite different from FCCMP on Exynos M1,
>> so it'd be helpful to have distinct types for them. Say, "fcmp{s,d}"
>> and "fccmp{s,d}". Would it be acceptable to add this with this patch or
>> later?
>
> It would be easy to add fccmps/d as new attributes, I prefer to do that as a
> separate
> patch. Are there any other attributes that you think are missing besides the
> ones I know
> about (extr, 64-bit mul/mla, mulh, bfi)?
>
> Also would we need a new entry in the cost tables?
For ThunderX they can treated as the same.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Wilco
>
>
