On 20/11/15 18:28 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 21:21:51 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
* python/hook.in: Call register_libstdcxx_printers.
* python/libstdcxx/v6/__init__.py: Wrap it to
register_libstdcxx_printers.
[...]
-import libstdcxx.v6
+# Call a function as a plain import would not execute body of the included file
+# on repeated reloads of this object file.
+from libstdcxx.v6 import register_libstdcxx_printers
+register_libstdcxx_printers(gdb.current_objfile())
Jonathan Wakely mentioned:
[libstdc++] Refactor python/hook.in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02518.html
From: Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com>
Message-ID:
<cagyq6gyqmpzyjmn6326qtazstaac1azodk5jx3ztmofym5p...@mail.gmail.com>
https://gcc.gnu.org/r215726
That change introduced this regression. This patch does not undo it, goal of
the patch by Siva Chandra - minimizing hook.in - stays achieved.
OK, thanks for checking, Jan.
The patch is OK for trunk and gcc-5-branch.
