On 11/24/15 00:01, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/23/2015 01:54 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 11/23/15 15:41, Jeff Law wrote:
In the 'put' function, why not just make all targets go through
putchar? It's not like this is performance critical code and I
don't think it compromises any of the tests, does it?
I contemplated that, but wondered if someone would complain. I'm
happy either way.
Let's go with a single codepath here. The one that ought to work for all
targets is putchar.
Done.
nathan
2015-11-24 Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org>
* gcc.dg/sso/dump.h: Force IO to be putchar function call on nvptx.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/dump.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/dump.h (revision 230809)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/dump.h (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+#ifdef __nvptx__
+/* Force function call. NVPTX's IO is extremely limited. */
+#undef putchar
+#endif
+
void dump (void *p, unsigned int len)
{
const char digits[17] = "0123456789abcdef";
@@ -14,7 +19,9 @@ void dump (void *p, unsigned int len)
void put (const char s[])
{
- fputs (s, stdout);
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; s[i]; i++)
+ putchar (s[i]);
}
void new_line (void)