On 12/16/2015 11:14 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/16/2015 10:13 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This is a relatively straightforward PR where we should mention a macro
expansion in a warning message. The patch below implements the
suggestion by Marek to pass a location down from
build_function_call_vec. Ok if tests pass on x86_64-linux?
Ping.
One question I have is about -Wformat, which is dealt with in the same
area. We do get a mention of the macro expansion, but in a different
style:
[...]
Is this what we're looking for in terms of output?
Are you referring to the "in definition" vs "in expansion" difference?
That appears to be a difference in the locus of the first displayed
diagnostic before the unwinding of the macros.
Yeah. I just wanted to point it out in case anyone sees something wrong
with this.
Bernd
