It's indeed fixed now. Thanks. Best regards,
Thomas > -----Original Message----- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Christian Bruel > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 6:13 PM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH, testsuite] Fix PR68632: gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837 > failure on M profile ARM targets > > Hi Thomas, > > > On 12/09/2015 10:57 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837 fails on M profile ARM targets because of > lack of neon instructions. This patch adds the necessary arm_neon_ok > effective target requirement to avoid running this test for such targets. > > > > This case also fails for all configs that don't have neon by default. > This is being fixed with > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00865.html > > > > ChangeLog entry is as follows: > > > > > > * gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** > > > > 2015-12-08 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com> > > > > PR testsuite/68632 > > * gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c: Require arm_neon_ok effective > > target. > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c > > index 000fc2a..fcc26a1 100644 > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c > > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > > /* { dg-lto-do run } */ > > +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_ok } */ > > /* { dg-lto-options {{-flto -mfpu=neon}} } */ > > /* { dg-suppress-ld-options {-mfpu=neon} } */ > > > > > > > > Testcase fails without the patch and succeeds with. > > > > Is this ok for trunk? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Thomas > > > >
