On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 06:42:35AM -0800, David Edelsohn wrote: >> Is there still an issue with the constraints used for movdi_internal64? > > Yes and no. No because we shouldn't be attempting DI moves between vsx > regs and gprs. Yes because we ought to allow DImode in vsx regs, but > fixing that is likely not trivial. > > Do we want to backport the PR68973 fixes to gcc-5 and gcc-4.9? We are > exposed to the reload_vsx_from_gprsf bug there, I think, but TFmode > won't be IEEE.
Backporting to 5 and 4.9 branches is okay with me. Thanks, David
