On 04/20/2016 07:03 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org writes:
I have some more patches that almost completely eliminate these, but I haven't
tested the rest yet, and this is already a long series so it would be nice to
get some of it out of my tree and reviewed.
patches individually bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, ok? I
expect none of this will more than textually conflict with something that may
need backported to gcc-6, but its waited a month already I guess it can wait
longer if people prefer.
A vector can have very different performance than a list, depending how
it is used. Do your patches cause any measure performance difference for
the compiler?
I've waffled between using a forward list and a vector for this stuff in
the past. The cases Trevor has changed so far seem suitable for either
without a performance impact either way.
jeff
