On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:41:51AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/26/2016 02:44 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > +     if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_TRY)
> >         {
> > +         /* A compiler-generated cleanup or a user-written try block.
> > +            Try to get the first statement in its try-block, for better
> > +            location.  */
> > +         if ((seq = gimple_try_eval (stmt)))
> > +           stmt = gimple_seq_first_stmt (seq);
> 
> Should this loop?  If there are two variables declared, do we get two try
> blocks?

It looks like we get only one try block, so this doesn't have to loop.  But I
at least added a new test to make sure we warn even with more decls.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2016-05-31  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        * gimplify.c (gimplify_switch_expr): Also handle GIMPLE_TRY.

        * c-c++-common/Wswitch-unreachable-3.c: New test.
        * g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-unreachable-1.C: New test.

diff --git gcc/gimplify.c gcc/gimplify.c
index 8316bb8..8b7dddc 100644
--- gcc/gimplify.c
+++ gcc/gimplify.c
@@ -1609,10 +1609,17 @@ gimplify_switch_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p)
          while (gimple_code (seq) == GIMPLE_BIND)
            seq = gimple_bind_body (as_a <gbind *> (seq));
          gimple *stmt = gimple_seq_first_stmt (seq);
-         enum gimple_code code = gimple_code (stmt);
-         if (code != GIMPLE_LABEL && code != GIMPLE_TRY)
+         if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_TRY)
            {
-             if (code == GIMPLE_GOTO
+             /* A compiler-generated cleanup or a user-written try block.
+                Try to get the first statement in its try-block, for better
+                location.  */
+             if ((seq = gimple_try_eval (stmt)))
+               stmt = gimple_seq_first_stmt (seq);
+           }
+         if (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_LABEL)
+           {
+             if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_GOTO
                  && TREE_CODE (gimple_goto_dest (stmt)) == LABEL_DECL
                  && DECL_ARTIFICIAL (gimple_goto_dest (stmt)))
                /* Don't warn for compiler-generated gotos.  These occur
diff --git gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wswitch-unreachable-3.c 
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wswitch-unreachable-3.c
index e69de29..c53cb10 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wswitch-unreachable-3.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wswitch-unreachable-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+extern void f (int *);
+
+void
+g (int i)
+{
+  switch (i)
+    {
+      int a[3];
+      __builtin_memset (a, 0, sizeof a); /* { dg-warning "statement will never 
be executed" } */
+
+    default:
+      f (a);
+    }
+
+  switch (i)
+    {
+      int a[3];
+      int b[3];
+      int c[3];
+      b[1] = 60; /* { dg-warning "statement will never be executed" } */
+
+    default:
+      f (a);
+      f (b);
+      f (c);
+    }
+}
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-unreachable-1.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-unreachable-1.C
index e69de29..99d9a83 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-unreachable-1.C
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wswitch-unreachable-1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+extern int j;
+
+void
+f (int i)
+{
+  switch (i) // { dg-warning "statement will never be executed" }
+    {
+      try
+      {
+      }
+      catch (...)
+      {
+      }
+    case 1:;
+    }
+}
+
+void
+g (int i)
+{
+  switch (i)
+    {
+      try
+      {
+       j = 42;  // { dg-warning "statement will never be executed" }
+      }
+      catch (...)
+      {
+      }
+    case 1:;
+    }
+}

        Marek

Reply via email to