Julian Brown <jul...@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:04:55 +0100
> Julian Brown <jul...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:47:57 +0100
>> Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This patch caused several regressions on big-endian 64-bit MIPS
>> > targets, which now try to shift single-precision floating-point
>> > arguments to the top of an FPR. [...]
>>
>> Sorry for the breakage!
>>
>> > The patch below borrows the padding code from the main call
>> > routines. It fixes the MIPS problems for me (tested on
>> > mips64-linux-gnu), but I'm not set up for big-endian ARM testing.
>> > From what I can tell, other targets' BLOCK_REG_PADDING definitions
>> > already handle null types.
>>
>> I tested your patch very lightly on ARM, by running arm.exp &
>> fixed-point.exp in both big & little-endian mode, and it looks fine.
>> I'll set off a more-complete test run also, in case that's helpful...
>
> The patch looks fine for big/little endian, gcc/g++/libstdc++, cross to
> ARM EABI, btw.
Great! Thanks for testing.
Maintainers: is the patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00735.html
OK to install? Tested by Julian on ARM BE and LE, and by me on
mips64-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Richard
