"Bin.Cheng" <amker.ch...@gmail.com> writes: >>> The test passes on aarch64, but fails on arm targets. Maybe that's >>> easier for Bin to reproduce? >> Hi all, >> Sorry for the inconvenience, I will have a look at the two targets. > Hmm, the failure is because post-increment is enabled in IVOPT on both > ia64 and arm. As a result, IVOPT tends to choose iv_cand which is > incremented after the first store. The dump for IVOPT is as:
FWIW, the test also fails on m68k, for the same reason. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
