Hi Grüße.

Could you please tell me how to reproduce your regression - did not
see any new failures in my local area:

PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O0  (test for excess errors)
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O0  execution test
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O1  (test for excess errors)
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O1  execution test
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O2  (test for excess errors)
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O2  execution test
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  (test for
excess errors)
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution
test
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -Os  (test for excess errors)
PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -Os  execution test

I used HASWELL machine for it since test requires target avx.

2016-06-29 19:19 GMT+03:00 Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:50:37 +0300, Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrum...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> Here is the second part of patch to improve loop invariant code motion
>> for loop marked with pragma omp simd.
>>
>> Bootstrapping and regression testing did not show any new failures.
>
> That got committed in r237844.  In my testing, that causes (or exposes?)
> the following regressions (both with offloading enabled and disabled):
>
>      PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O1  (test for excess 
> errors)
>      PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O1  execution test
>      PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O2  (test for excess 
> errors)
>     -PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O2  execution test
>     +FAIL: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O2  execution test
>      PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
> -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  (test for excess 
> errors)
>     -PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
> -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
>     +FAIL: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
> -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
>      PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -g  (test for excess 
> errors)
>     -PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
>     +FAIL: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
>      PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -Os  (test for excess 
> errors)
>      PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90   -Os  execution test
>      PASS: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-3.f90   -O0  (test for excess 
> errors)
>
> These are segmentation faults, for example:
>
>     Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory 
> reference.
>
>     Backtrace for this error:
>     #0  0x7fb65eeb52ef in ???
>     #1  0x400845 in __simd2_mod_MOD_add2
>             at 
> [...]/source-gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90:18
>     #2  0x400845 in __simd2_mod_MOD_work
>             at 
> [...]/source-gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90:29
>     #3  0x4008d4 in MAIN__
>             at 
> [...]/source-gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90:68
>     #4  0x4005dc in main
>             at 
> [...]/source-gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-2.f90:58
>     Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
>> PR tree-optimization/70729
>> * tree-ssa-loop-im.c (ref_indep_loop_p_1): Consider memory reference as
>> independent in loops having positive safelen value.
>> * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_transform_loop): Clear-up safelen value since
>> it may be not valid after vectorization.
>
>
> Grüße
>  Thomas

Reply via email to