On 07/14/2016 01:21 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: >> On 07/13/2016 07:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> Isn't that a code quality regression? So instead shouldn't we be keeping >>> the same expectation, but xfailing the test? >>> >>> jeff >> >> Hello. >> >> Disabling a pass before slsr makes the test to catch both opportunities. >> Is the patch fine? > > No, this is still a code quality regression. What happens is that for > some reason we fail to sink for GCC 6.
So should I just mark the test-case as a xfail? M. > > Richard. > >> Thanks, >> Martin
