Re: RFA: new pass to warn on questionable uses of alloca() and VLAs

[Jeff Law]

On 07/17/2016 09:52 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
+  if (is_vla)
+    gcc_assert (warn_vla_limit > 0);
+  if (!is_vla)
+    gcc_assert (warn_alloca_limit > 0);
if-else ? Or perhaps:
Shouldn't really matter, except perhaps in a -O0 compilation.  Though I 
think else-if makes it slightly clearer.


gcc_assert (!is_vla || warn_vla_limit > 0);
gcc_assert (is_vla || warn_alloca_limit > 0);
Would be acceptable as well.  I think any of the 3 is fine and leave it 
to Aldy's discretion which to use.

Jeff