The dg-error was on the wrong line in this test. It happened to
pass by chance because it was on line 31 and the error happened at
location 30:31 so the column number matched the dg-error line number!
Running with -fno-show-column caused it to fail.
Splitting the expression into three lines allows us to put the
dg-error with the right sub-expression, and make sure it matches
what's intended.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 203176bafe5b215f44bd82dd4e5cacd06a1cb6ab
Author: redi <redi@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Wed Jul 27 17:32:45 2016 +0000
* testsuite/20_util/forward/1_neg.cc: Move dg-error to right line.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@238793
138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/forward/1_neg.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/forward/1_neg.cc
index d2f3477..97851f2 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/forward/1_neg.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/forward/1_neg.cc
@@ -27,8 +27,9 @@ template<class T, class A1, class A2>
std::shared_ptr<T>
factory(A1&& a1, A2&& a2)
{
- return std::shared_ptr<T>(new T(std::forward<A1>(a1),
- std::forward<A2>(a2))); // { dg-error
"rvalue" }
+ return std::shared_ptr<T>(
+ new T(std::forward<A1>(a1), // { dg-error "rvalue" }
+ std::forward<A2>(a2)));
}
struct A
