Why not check for error_mark_node right after the tsubst_template_args?
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Patrick Palka <patr...@parcs.ath.cx> wrote:
> This patch fixes PR c++/72759. The problem seems to be that when
> instantiating a variable template, we fail to propagate error_mark_node
> when its template arguments are erroneous, and we instead build a bogus
> TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR which later confuses check_initializer(). Does this
> look OK to commit after bootstrap + regtesting?
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c++/72759
> * pt.c (tsubst_qualified_id): Return error_mark_node if
> template_args is error_mark_node.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR c++/72759
> * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr72759.C: New test.
> ---
> gcc/cp/pt.c | 3 +++
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr72759.C | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr72759.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> index a23a05a..6b70a65 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
> @@ -13907,6 +13907,9 @@ tsubst_qualified_id (tree qualified_id, tree args,
>
> if (is_template)
> {
> + if (template_args == error_mark_node)
> + return error_mark_node;
> +
> if (variable_template_p (expr))
> expr = lookup_and_finish_template_variable (expr, template_args,
> complain);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr72759.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr72759.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4af6ea4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/pr72759.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +// PR c++/72759
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
> +
> +template <typename> struct SpecPerType;
> +class Specializer {
> + public: template <bool> static void MbrFnTempl();
> + template <unsigned> struct A { static void InnerMemberFn(); };
> + void Trigger() { A<0>::InnerMemberFn; }
> +};
> +template <> struct SpecPerType<Specializer> {
> + using FnType = void *;
> + template <bool P>
> + static constexpr FnType SpecMbrFnPtr = Specializer::MbrFnTempl<P>;
> +};
> +template <unsigned X> void Specializer::A<X>::InnerMemberFn() {
> + using Spec = SpecPerType<Specializer>;
> + Spec ErrorSite = Spec::SpecMbrFnPtr<SpecMbrFnPtr>; // { dg-error "not
> declared" }
> +}
> --
> 2.9.2.564.g4d4f0b7
>
