On 08/05/16 08:48, Martin Liška wrote:
Ok, after all the experimenting and inventing "almost" thread-safe code, I incline to not to include __gcov_one_value_profiler_body_atomic counter. The final solution is cumbersome and probably does not worth doing. Moreover, even having a thread-safe implementation, result of an indirect call counter is not going to be stable among different runs (due to a single value storage capability).If you agree, I'll prepare a final version of patch?
Agreed. nathan
